Day of Rest Requirements Applicable to Ag on January 1, 2017
In addition to the AB 1066 (Gonzalez, D-San Diego) repeal of agriculture’s long-standing 10-hour straight-time workday and the gradual imposition of an 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek for agricultural employees, AB 1066 contained another change that has not yet attracted much attention, it applies to agricultural employment for the first time the one-day’s-rest-in-seven rule, effective Jan. 1, 2017.
The law that will apply to agricultural employment prohibits an employer from “causing” an employee to work more than six days in seven.
The California Supreme Court should soon decide in Mendoza v. Nordstrom exactly what “cause” means in this context: is it enough to merely let employees work on the seventh day, or must an employer compel employees to work on the seventh day to be causing them to work?
The day-of-rest provision in Labor Code section 554 that will apply to agricultural employees on Jan. 1 does permit an employer to have them work seven or more consecutive days “when the nature of the employment reasonably requires that the employee work seven or more consecutive days, if in each calendar month the employee receives days of rest equivalent to one day’s rest in seven.”
Source: Farm Employers Labor Service | 2017 © Copyright Payroll Masters
Payroll Masters is not a licensed insurance broker or agent and does not provide professional or legal advice. This document has been provided for informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. Please contact your employment attorney in connection with any fact-specific situation in which you intend to take significant employment action. Readers agree that they will hold Payroll Masters in indemnity and Payroll Masters assumes no liability. Payroll Masters is not engaged in rendering legal or accounting services. Therefore, Payroll Masters assumes no responsibility for claims arising from the use or implementation of the above information.